A safety walk-through helps only if the findings leave the inspector's notebook. I want each walk to end in a row with an area, a risk level, a person to fix it and a date. A form on a phone makes that the easiest way to finish.
The walk-through
Inspector, area and date, so that every finding has an author and a place. One entry per area keeps the CSV easy to sort.
The findings
Two tick lists: what is fine and what needs action. Then free notes and a risk level. The risk level sorts the list, so a stop-work item cannot hide under a dozen minor ones.
The follow-up
Who fixes it, by when, and whether the area manager was told in person. Without an owner and a date, a finding is only an opinion.
Who fills it and who reads it
An inspector or supervisor fills in one entry for each area. A manager reads the CSV and filters for high risk. The inspector's AI can ask: "Which area did you inspect?" Then "Which items need action?" Then "How high is the risk?" It shows the answers and sends them only after a yes. See agent-fillable forms.
Before you use it
Rewrite the tick lists to match your site, because a bakery and a warehouse do not share a list. This form records a walk-through. It does not replace a qualified inspection. Inspecting products rather than places? Use a quality inspection checklist. Kitchens can start with a restaurant opening checklist. More tools are in IT and operations forms.
Questions
How do I track fixes?
Filter the CSV on `risk_level` and sort by `fix_by`. Check the rows each week and note in your own tracker when each fix is done. The form does not close findings for you.
How often should inspectors send an entry?
Choose a fixed day for each area and post the link where the walk starts. Sorting by `inspected_area` then shows which areas were skipped.
Should the inspector name staff in the notes?
Better not. Describe the hazard and the place, not the person. That keeps the record about the fix, and people speak more openly.